Edmonton Green PDSA Pet Clinic

Edmonton Green PDSA Pet Clinic is part of PDSA (a charity) and is described on the PDSA site as providing free and low‑cost veterinary care to pets in need. Recent reviews suggest a mixed experience: some owners emphasise cost and support (including a receptionist and vet described as helpful), while others report practical problems such as difficulty getting through by phone and delays receiving prescribed medication. One recent reviewer also felt a consultation didn’t fully check the problem before recommending medication.

Services

• •Veterinary treatment for dogs is referenced in reviews (owners mention bringing a dog in for treatment).
• •Prescribing medication is specifically mentioned (including one complaint about waiting for medication after it was meant to be provided).
• •The PDSA site describes the clinic’s purpose as providing free and low‑cost veterinary care to pets in need (no specific procedures are listed in the website summary provided).

Pricing

• •One reviewer mentions “£25 for a service” (the specific service isn’t stated).

People

• •Reception team: one reviewer describes the receptionist as “lovely and helpful,” particularly around getting support at the clinic.
• •Vets: experiences described are mixed—one reviewer was grateful for the vet’s help, while another felt the vet “didn’t check the issue properly” and was quick to suggest medication.

Reviews

Google rating: 4.3 stars from 191 reviews. “”

• •Cost/value is a major draw: one reviewer highlights a “£25” service and another contrasts PDSA support with much higher quoted costs elsewhere (mentioned as £900 for an x‑ray/scan and £1200 for a heart scan at another provider).
• •Staff interactions can be very positive: multiple reviews mention friendly workers and feeling their dog was treated well; one specifically praises both receptionist and vet.
• •Access/communication issues are raised: one reviewer says it was “impossible to get someone on the phone” and reports waiting for medication and follow‑up contact.
• •Concerns about clinical thoroughness appear in a negative review: one owner felt their pet’s issue wasn’t checked properly before medication was suggested.